Global oil and gas supermajor; one of the world's largest carbon emitters. UK-incorporated since 2022.
Green Score
- Greenwashing risk
- high
- Data confidence
- high
- Method
- how it is calculated
Climate Impact & Solution35%8
Does the core business genuinely avoid or reduce emissions, or build climate resilience? Share of revenue that is actually 'green'. Fossil-dependent models score low.
Shell's core business produces and sells fossil fuels at massive scale; only ~13.3% of investments qualify as genuinely renewable under standardized EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy, and the company has cut its renewable energy pipeline and scrapped its 2030 fossil fuel production reduction target.
Decarbonization & Targets20%22
Credible, science-based targets (SBTi), a real net-zero plan with progress to date, and CDP disclosure — not just a dated press release.
Shell has a 2050 net-zero ambition and Scope 1/2 absolute targets, but critically admits in SEC filings that the 2050 target is outside its operational planning period and expressly told CDP in 2023 it does not plan to develop a 1.5°C-aligned transition plan; targets are not SBTi-validated and rely heavily on an intensity metric (NCI) rather than absolute reductions.
ESG & Operations15%30
Operational footprint, labour and social practices, and governance quality across the company's own operations and supply chain.
Shell discloses under CSRD, TCFD, and GRI frameworks and ties some executive pay to GHG KPIs, but faces active groundwater contamination and pesticide litigation, labour restructuring controversies, and ongoing governance concerns raised by ClientEarth's board-level climate risk lawsuit.
Transparency & Verification15%40
Quality of disclosure, independent third-party verification, and how much hard data backs the company's claims.
Shell publishes extensive annual reports, SEC 20-F filings, and a CDP response, and discloses a lobbying report; however, key disclosures are hedged with disclaimers, the NCI metric is proprietary and not directly comparable, the 2050 target is explicitly excluded from operational plans, and independent third-party verification of Scope 3 remains limited.
Integrity15%18
Controversies, litigation, pollution, fossil-fuel lobbying, conflict-zone involvement and governance scandals. Higher means cleaner.
Shell has accumulated severe integrity deficits: 30+ active climate-change lawsuits in the US; a landmark 2021 Dutch court emissions order (overturned on appeal in 2024); UK ASA greenwashing bans in 2023; continued membership in the American Petroleum Institute and other anti-climate-policy lobbying groups; and documented funding of organisations linked to climate disinformation.
Ownership
Owns
- ubitricity· subsidiaryvia ubitricity.com
Related
- LanzaJet· investmentvia lanzajet.com
Why it's on ClimateTicker
Shell appears on climate platforms because it is one of the world's largest energy companies and has made a 2050 net-zero pledge with Scope 1, 2, and NCI targets — but its core business remains overwhelmingly fossil fuel-based, with over two-thirds of capital expenditure directed to oil and gas. The gap between its green marketing and its actual investment portfolio is large and well-documented; its own filings concede that the 2050 target lies outside its operational planning horizon and is contingent on societal-level change.
Commitments & Certifications
Controversy & Greenwashing Watch
Shell scrapped its target to cut fossil fuel production 55% by 2030 and cut its renewable energy pipeline by around 10%, citing profitability pressures.edie.net
Shell has provided grants to organisations including the Heartland Foundation, a known disseminator of climate disinformation, and the Heritage Foundation, the institution behind Project 2025.adfreecities.org.uk
Shell remains a member of the American Petroleum Institute and other associations with documented histories of lobbying against climate policy, despite its own stated Paris Agreement commitments.clientearth.org
As of December 31, 2025, more than 30 lawsuits in the US name Shell as a defendant for climate change harms caused by fossil fuel use and alleged deceptive conduct.sec.gov
Shell faces approximately six pending US lawsuits alleging groundwater contamination from chemical pesticide applications, with additional claims not yet filed.sec.gov
Shell's 2024 'Powering Progress' TV ads attracted 76 complaints to the ASA; critics including Carbon Tracker argued the ads disproportionately featured green imagery while 68% of Shell's investments remained in oil and gas.adfreecities.org.uk
The Hague District Court ordered Shell to cut value-chain emissions 45% by 2030 vs. 2019 levels; Shell appealed and the Hague Court of Appeal overturned the ruling in November 2024, sparking debate over corporate climate accountability.climatehughes.org
NGO ClientEarth sued all Shell board members personally for allegedly failing to adequately manage climate-change-related risks to the company.clearygottlieb.com
The UK Advertising Standards Authority banned Shell ads in 2023, ruling they misrepresented Shell's business activities by presenting a green image while the company remained primarily a fossil fuel business.adfreecities.org.uk
Community Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!
ClimateTicker assessments are evidence-based research, not investment advice. Companies and readers can challenge a factual claim or submit better evidence.