Sylvera

74Credible Contributor· Provisional
0 followersCarbon removal·London, UK·Founded 2020
www.sylvera.com

London carbon intelligence platform rating voluntary carbon credits AAA–D using satellite data, LiDAR, and machine learning to bring independent MRV and transparency to carbon markets.

74/100
Credible Contributor· Provisional

ClimateTicker Green Score · how it's calculated

Greenwashing risk: lowData confidence: medium

Why it's on ClimateTicker

Sylvera is a London-based carbon intelligence platform that brings independent, data-driven ratings to the voluntary carbon market, using satellite imagery, LiDAR, and machine learning to assess the quality of carbon credits on an AAA–D scale. Its core climate value is as an 'integrity enabler' — it does not remove carbon itself, but its ratings infrastructure is designed to redirect capital away from low-quality, potentially fraudulent offsets toward genuinely high-impact projects. The platform's credibility hinges on the independence and accuracy of its ratings; it has no brokerage conflict of interest, but operates in a market where even its own data acknowledges that the majority of rated projects fall short of top quality.

enablerSylvera monetizes via SaaS subscriptions and API access to its carbon intelligence platform, serving corporations, financial institutions, and governments who need to screen, procure, and report on carbon credit quality. A recent integration with the Bloomberg Terminal further embeds its ratings data into institutional financial workflows.

Commitments & Certifications

Controversy & Greenwashing Watch

low2023 operational emissions increased despite SBTi net-zero commitment

In its first year of SBTi-validated targets, Sylvera's total emissions rose approximately 17% year-on-year, attributed to business growth, raising questions about near-term trajectory vs. stated 2030 reduction milestones.source ↗

lowDisputed REDD+ rating methodology vs. Guardian/academic research

In January 2023, The Guardian and UC Berkeley researchers claimed up to 94% of REDD+ credits were ineffective; Sylvera publicly disputed the methodology while acknowledging that a significant minority of rated credits are low quality, raising questions about whether its own ratings are consistently conservative enough.source ↗

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!