Measurabl

Does the core business genuinely avoid or reduce emissions, or build climate resilience? Share of revenue that is actually 'green'. Fossil-dependent models score low.

Measurabl's core product directly supports building decarbonisation by automating Scope 1/2 GHG accounting, enabling CRREM-aligned pathway planning, and surfacing energy-reduction opportunities for over 1,000 customers managing 21 billion sq ft — a meaningful systemic lever in the highest-emitting sector, but the platform enables rather than guarantees actual emission reductions by clients.

Credible, science-based targets (SBTi), a real net-zero plan with progress to date, and CDP disclosure — not just a dated press release.

No evidence of SBTi-validated science-based targets, CDP disclosure score, or a published net-zero roadmap for Measurabl's own operations was found in public sources; the company markets its platform as the antidote to greenwashing yet does not appear to have submitted its own emissions to independent third-party validation, which is a material gap for a self-described sustainability leader.

Operational footprint, labour and social practices, and governance quality across the company's own operations and supply chain.

As a ~120-200 person software company, Measurabl's operational footprint is inherently modest (primarily office-based, cloud-hosted), and no material labour, diversity, or governance controversies were surfaced; however, the company publishes no standalone sustainability/ESG report for its own operations, and detailed workforce or governance metrics are not publicly disclosed.

Quality of disclosure, independent third-party verification, and how much hard data backs the company's claims.

Measurabl publishes rich third-party-validated product data (ESGx Benchmarks, the Measurabl Intelligence Report using meter-level Quantum Cloud data) and client-facing audit-ready reporting, but its own corporate sustainability disclosures — Scope 1/2/3 emissions, energy use, workforce metrics — are not independently verified or publicly reported, undermining the credibility of its sustainability positioning.

Controversies, litigation, pollution, fossil-fuel lobbying, conflict-zone involvement and governance scandals. Higher means cleaner.

No material controversies, litigation, regulatory sanctions, pollution incidents, fossil-fuel lobbying, or governance scandals were identified in public records; the company's positioning, investor base (Energy Impact Partners, Camber Creek), and customer references are consistent and credible.