Nature-based solutions
Forest Carbon
67Credible ContributorEdinburgh, United KingdomFounded 20060 followers
www.forestcarbon.co.uk/UK's leading developer of Woodland Carbon Code and Peatland Code projects, having funded 13M+ trees planted and 2,000 hectares of peatland restored; became employee-owned in 2023.
Green Score
- Greenwashing risk
- low
- Data confidence
- medium
- Method
- how it is calculated
Climate Impact & Solution35%82
Does the core business genuinely avoid or reduce emissions, or build climate resilience? Share of revenue that is actually 'green'. Fossil-dependent models score low.
Core business directly removes CO₂ via woodland creation and avoids emissions from degraded peatland restoration, with 3.3 million tonnes of CO₂e projected across its project portfolio — credible because credits are independently verified under UK government-backed standards, not self-declared.
Decarbonization & Targets20%30
Credible, science-based targets (SBTi), a real net-zero plan with progress to date, and CDP disclosure — not just a dated press release.
No SBTi-validated targets, no CDP disclosure, and no publicly documented net-zero plan with interim milestones found for Forest Carbon as a corporate entity; the company facilitates third-party verified project-level carbon accounting for clients but does not appear to have submitted its own operational emissions to any recognised framework.
ESG & Operations15%65
Operational footprint, labour and social practices, and governance quality across the company's own operations and supply chain.
Employee ownership trust governance (since end-2023) is a genuine positive for labour and social alignment; the team is small (~8 employees), limiting operational footprint, and co-founder received an OBE for environmental services, but no formal ESG report, living-wage certification, or supply-chain labour disclosure was found publicly.
Transparency & Verification15%60
Quality of disclosure, independent third-party verification, and how much hard data backs the company's claims.
Project-level transparency is strong — all WCC and Peatland Code projects are listed on the public UK Land Carbon Registry and subject to UKAS-accredited third-party validation and periodic verification — but entity-level disclosure (annual accounts beyond Companies House filings, operational carbon footprint, remuneration) is minimal for an investor-facing profile.
Integrity15%88
Controversies, litigation, pollution, fossil-fuel lobbying, conflict-zone involvement and governance scandals. Higher means cleaner.
No material controversies, greenwashing allegations, litigation, regulatory sanctions, or governance scandals found specific to Forest Carbon; the company actively co-authored the UK standards it operates under and won Sustainable Consultancy of the Year at the 2024 Sustainability Awards, with no red flags in public records.
Why it's on ClimateTicker
Forest Carbon is the UK's longest-standing developer of Woodland Carbon Code and Peatland Code projects, with a core business built around genuine carbon removal and avoided emissions through native woodland creation and peatland restoration. Its projects operate under UK government-backed standards with mandatory third-party verification, giving them materially stronger integrity than typical voluntary carbon market offerings. The principal investor caveat is that Forest Carbon is a small employee-owned firm with limited standalone corporate ESG disclosure, no SBTi targets, and no CDP filing — so project-level credibility is strong but entity-level transparency is thin.
Commitments & Certifications
Controversy & Greenwashing Watch
Broader voluntary carbon market scrutiny — particularly of REDD+ credits globally — creates reputational headwinds for all carbon credit developers, though Forest Carbon's UK government-backed WCC/Peatland Code model is structurally more robust than the tropical REDD+ credits at the centre of 2023 greenwashing investigations.news.mongabay.com
Related News
Community Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!
ClimateTicker assessments are evidence-based research, not investment advice. Companies and readers can challenge a factual claim or submit better evidence.