Produces ABUNDA mycoprotein by continuously fermenting fungi with grain sugars, delivering a complete-protein, high-fibre meat and dairy alternative at industrial scale.
Green Score
- Greenwashing risk
- medium
- Data confidence
- medium
- Method
- how it is calculated
Climate Impact & Solution35%78
Does the core business genuinely avoid or reduce emissions, or build climate resilience? Share of revenue that is actually 'green'. Fossil-dependent models score low.
Independent EU-funded LCA (PLENITUDE project) confirms ~3 kg CO2eq/kg mycoprotein at gate, versus ~30–60 kg for beef and ~8 kg for pork, and a systematic review (Shahid et al. 2024) found mycoprotein's GHG emissions lower than even soy or pea protein; the zero-waste co-location with Cargill recycles fermentation by-products, further reducing footprint — but the LCA excludes downstream processing stages, and grain feedstock supply-chain emissions are a residual risk.
Decarbonization & Targets20%22
Credible, science-based targets (SBTi), a real net-zero plan with progress to date, and CDP disclosure — not just a dated press release.
No evidence of SBTi commitment or validated targets, no CDP disclosure, and no published net-zero roadmap with interim Scope 1/2/3 milestones; the only publicly stated 'target' is the aspirational production volume of 1 million tonnes by 2032, which is a growth target rather than an emissions reduction commitment.
ESG & Operations15%52
Operational footprint, labour and social practices, and governance quality across the company's own operations and supply chain.
Social LCA (PLENITUDE) shows positive local employment outcomes — 45 permanent jobs created in Sas van Gent with 90% local workforce, plans to grow to 100 jobs — and the EU Horizon 2020/CBE JU grant framework imposes governance oversight; however, no published sustainability report, no independent labour audit, no Board-level ESG committee disclosed, and governance is typical of a VC-backed scale-up with limited public accountability.
Transparency & Verification15%38
Quality of disclosure, independent third-party verification, and how much hard data backs the company's claims.
The headline '97% fewer CO2 emissions than beef' and '15x more efficient' claims are company-sourced and not independently verified at the corporate level; the PLENITUDE LCA is the only third-party quantified assessment and it was scoped to upstream/gate-to-gate only, excluding downstream processing; there is no annual sustainability report, no CDP response, and no third-party-verified GHG inventory published.
Integrity15%82
Controversies, litigation, pollution, fossil-fuel lobbying, conflict-zone involvement and governance scandals. Higher means cleaner.
No material controversies, litigation, regulatory sanctions, pollution incidents, fossil-fuel lobbying, or governance scandals identified in public records; the company is funded by credible climate-focused investors (World Fund, AXA Impact Fund – Climate & Biodiversity) and operates under EU research grant governance, providing modest additional integrity assurance.
Why it's on ClimateTicker
ENOUGH produces ABUNDA mycoprotein via continuous fermentation of fungi on grain sugars, a process independently LCA-assessed to emit ~3 kg CO2eq per kg of product — dramatically lower than beef (~30–60 kg) and substantially lower than pork (~8 kg), making the core business a genuine GHG displacement play. The emission-reduction case is credible and backed by an independent EU-funded LCA (PLENITUDE/CBE JU), though headline '97% fewer emissions than beef' marketing figures are self-reported comparisons that overstate the gap when downstream processing is included. The company has no publicly verifiable SBTi commitment, CDP disclosure, or B-Corp certification, leaving its own operational decarbonisation trajectory unaudited.
Commitments & Certifications
Controversy & Greenwashing Watch
ENOUGH's widely-cited '97% fewer CO2 emissions than beef' figure is self-reported and based on a partial-scope comparison; the independent PLENITUDE LCA yields ~3 kg CO2eq/kg (gate-to-gate), which is materially higher than the implied figure and excludes downstream processing, raising the risk of overstated environmental benefit in marketing materials.foodnavigator.com
Community Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!
ClimateTicker assessments are evidence-based research, not investment advice. Companies and readers can challenge a factual claim or submit better evidence.